Quantifying Gharar in Islamic Digital Finance

Authors

  • Tariqullah Khan Chief Executive Officer & Principal Economist, Ventureethica, Toronto Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70009/jels.2026.3.1.1

Keywords:

gharar, Islamic digital finance, smart contracts, stablecoins, DeFi, oracle risk, composability, governance mutability, AAOIFI Shari'ah Standards, Maqasid al-Shari'ah

Abstract

The new economy is substantively digital and trust based. Prohibition of Gharar (contractual uncertainty) in the traditionally economy serves as a guardrail to enhance trust in the markets. This paper shows that Gharar in the digital economy has additional features and develops a quantitative framework for assessing Gharar in Islamic digital finance. Two structural axes - Specifiability (S, the epistemic determinacy of a contract’s terms) and Deliverability (D, the ontological certainty of its subject matter) - are derived from the classical taxonomy of Gharar sources and combined into a coordinate space (S, D) ∈ [-1, +1]². Admissibility is determined by axis signs alone: a contract is admissible if and only if (S, D) ∈ Q1 (S > 0 and D > 0); contracts in Q2, Q3, and Q4 are categorically batil and instantiate the classical taxonomy without remainder. Within Q1, quality is continuous, stratified by min(S, D) into Robust, Standard, and Marginal bands and measured by the d-gap from the optimum v* = (+1, +1). A maqasid-grounded Tayyib constraint τ ∈ [0, 1] operates as an independent floor alongside the (S, D) admissibility test. The framework is then extended to digital contracts, which exhibit five structurally novel properties - entanglement of the two axes, composability across protocols, governance mutability, ordering risk through adversarial transaction sequencing, and time-dependence through continuous attestation - that the classical taxonomy was never required to address. The paper formalises these properties, decomposes each axis into three sub-dimensions specific to digital contracts, generalises the framework from points to trajectories, specialises the τ-constraint to digital-asset maqasid considerations, and proposes a Substitution-Transformation-Offset (STO) remediation taxonomy with digital instruments. Five case studies illustrate the framework across structurally distinct digital instruments. The paper concludes by identifying the absence of a dedicated multilateral Shari’ah Standard on cryptoassets as itself a finding and positioning the framework as a candidate scaffold for future standards-development work.

Author Biography

  • Tariqullah Khan, Chief Executive Officer & Principal Economist, Ventureethica, Toronto

    Chief Executive Officer & Principal Economist, Ventureethica, Toronto | Formerly Professor, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar; IZU, Türkiye; INCEIF, Malaysia; Division Chief, Islamic Banking and Finance, IsDBI | President, International Association for Islamic Economics |

References

AAOIFI (Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions). (2017). Shari’ah Standards. Manama: AAOIFI.

AAOIFI. (2024). Exposure Draft of Shari’ah Standard No. 62 on Sukuk. Manama: AAOIFI.

Adam, M. F. (2017). Bitcoin: Shari’ah Compliant? Amanah Finance Consultancy Working Paper.

Adam, M. F. (2019). Shari’ah Analysis of Cryptocurrencies and Initial Coin Offerings. Amanah Finance Consultancy Working Paper.

al-Kasani, A.-D. (12th c.). Bada’i’ al-Sana’i’ fi Tartib al-Shara’i’. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyya edition (1986).

al-Saati, A.-R. (2003). The Permissible Gharar (Risk) in Classical Islamic Jurisprudence. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics 16(2): 3–19.

al-Sarakhsi, M. (11th c.). Al-Mabsut. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifa edition (1989).

al-Suwailem, S. (2000). Towards an Objective Measure of Gharar in Exchange. Islamic Economic Studies, 7(1&2), 61-102.

al-Suwailem, S. (2006). Hedging in Islamic Finance. Jeddah: Islamic Research and Training Institute, Islamic Development Bank.

Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shari’ah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London: International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2022). Prudential Treatment of Cryptoasset Exposures. Basel: Bank for International Settlements (SCO60, December 2022, revised July 2024).

Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index. University of Cambridge Judge Business School. https://ccaf.io/cbnsi/cbeci

Chapra, M. U. (1992). Islam and the Economic Challenge. Leicester: Islamic Foundation.

Chapra, M. U. (2008). The Islamic Vision of Development in the Light of the Maqasid al-Shari’ah. Jeddah: IRTI.

El-Gamal, M. A. (2006). Islamic Finance: Law, Economics, and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ibn Ashur, M. T. (2006). Treatise on Maqasid al-Shari’ah. Translated by M. El-Tahir El-Mesawi. Herndon: International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Ibn Qudamah, ‘A.-A. (12th c.). Al-Mughni. Riyadh: Dar ‘Ālam al-Kutub edition (1997).

Ibn Rushd, A.-W. (12th c.). Bidayat al-Mujtahid wa Nihayat al-Muqtasid. Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifa edition

(1996).

Juels, A., A. Kosba, and E. Shi. (2016). “The Ring of Gyges: Investigating the Future of Criminal Smart Contracts.” Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security: 283–295.

Kamali, M. H. (2000). Islamic Commercial Law: An Analysis of Futures and Options. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.

Khan, T (2026). Dynamic Prescriptive Economics: General Theory and Practice of Decision under Complexity”. Ventureethica. https://www.tariqullah.com/dynamic-prescriptive-economics_1

Muneeza, A., and Z. Mustapha. (2019). “Blockchain and Its Shari’ah-Compliant Structure.” In Halal Cryptocurrency Management, ed. M. M. Billah. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Muneeza, A., et al. (2021). Smart Sukuk: A Conceptual Framework for the Application of Smart Contracts to Sukuk. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 14(5): 924–946.

Nakamoto, S. (2008). “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.” Bitcoin White Paper.

Obaidullah, M. (2002). Islamic Risk Management: Towards Greater Ethics and Efficiency. International Journal of Islamic Financial Services 3(4): 1–18.

Shariyah Review Bureau. (2018). The Shari’ah Factor in Cryptocurrencies and Tokens. Manama: SRB.

Usmani, M. T. (2018). Decisive Verdicts on the Cryptocurrency Question. Karachi: Maktabah Ma’ārif al-Qur’ān.

Werner, S. M., D. Perez, L. Gudgeon, A. Klages-Mundt, D. Harz, and W. Knottenbelt. (2022). “SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi).” arXiv:2101.08778.

Zhou, L., et al. (2023). “SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Attacks.” 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy: 2444–2461.

Downloads

Published

05-08-2026

How to Cite

Quantifying Gharar in Islamic Digital Finance. (2026). Journal of Economics, Law and Society, 3(1), 5-29. https://doi.org/10.70009/jels.2026.3.1.1

Similar Articles

1-10 of 22

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.